=> Bootstrap dependency digest>=20010302: found digest-20121220 WARNING: [license.mk] Every package should define a LICENSE. ===> Skipping vulnerability checks. WARNING: No /var/db/pkg/pkg-vulnerabilities file found. WARNING: To fix run: `/usr/sbin/pkg_admin -K /var/db/pkg fetch-pkg-vulnerabilities'. => Checksum SHA1 OK for Mesa-7.11.2/MesaGLUT-7.11.2.tar.bz2 => Checksum RMD160 OK for Mesa-7.11.2/MesaGLUT-7.11.2.tar.bz2 => Checksum SHA1 OK for Mesa-7.11.2/MesaLib-7.11.2.tar.bz2 => Checksum RMD160 OK for Mesa-7.11.2/MesaLib-7.11.2.tar.bz2 ===> Installing dependencies for MesaDemos-7.11.2 ========================================================================== The following variables will affect the build process of this package, MesaDemos-7.11.2. Their current value is shown below: * PYTHON_VERSION_DEFAULT = 27 Based on these variables, the following variables have been set: * PYPACKAGE = python27 You may want to abort the process now with CTRL-C and change their value before continuing. Be sure to run `/usr/bin/make clean' after the changes. ========================================================================== => Tool dependency automake>=1.9: found automake-1.14.1 => Tool dependency autoconf>=2.58: found autoconf-2.69nb3 => Tool dependency bison>=1.0: found bison-3.0.2 => Tool dependency gmake>=3.81: found gmake-4.0 => Tool dependency pkg-config>=0.25: found pkg-config-0.28 => Tool dependency checkperms>=1.1: found checkperms-1.11 => Build dependency x11-links>=0.80: found x11-links-0.81 => Build dependency python27>=2.7.1nb2: found python27-2.7.6 => Build dependency libxml2>=2.8.0nb2: found libxml2-2.9.1nb1 ===> Overriding tools for MesaDemos-7.11.2 ===> Extracting for MesaDemos-7.11.2 ===> Patching for MesaDemos-7.11.2 => Applying pkgsrc patches for MesaDemos-7.11.2 => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-af => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-af Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-af,v 1.13 2010/03/27 12:55:00 tnn Exp $ | |--- src/mesa/drivers/dri/sis/sis_context.h.orig 2009-01-22 17:38:34.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/mesa/drivers/dri/sis/sis_context.h -------------------------- Patching file src/mesa/drivers/dri/sis/sis_context.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 404. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-bin_mklib => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-bin_mklib Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-bin_mklib,v 1.3 2013/11/29 15:27:19 bsiegert Exp $ | |Solaris ld seemingly has a hard time swallowing nested archives, |so flatten them out as is done for linux. | |Also, to simplify PLIST processing, add versioned shared libraries |for SunOS. | |--- bin/mklib.orig Sat Oct 15 00:43:34 2011 |+++ bin/mklib -------------------------- Patching file bin/mklib using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 305. Hunk #2 succeeded at 404. Hunk #3 succeeded at 426. Hunk #4 succeeded at 530. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-configure.ac => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-configure.ac Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-configure.ac,v 1.1 2013/05/16 05:22:02 richard Exp $ | |--- configure.ac.orig 2011-10-15 00:43:58.000000000 +0000 |+++ configure.ac -------------------------- Patching file configure.ac using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1086. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-include_GL_gl.h => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-include_GL_gl.h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-include_GL_gl.h,v 1.1 2013/06/13 14:16:21 wiz Exp $ | |Check for symbol existence with #ifdef, not #if. |Needed since some other files only #define the symbol without a value. | |--- include/GL/gl.h.orig 2011-11-23 01:09:52.000000000 +0000 |+++ include/GL/gl.h -------------------------- Patching file include/GL/gl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2094. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_gallium_auxiliary_util_u__atomic.h => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_gallium_auxiliary_util_u__atomic.h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_gallium_auxiliary_util_u__atomic.h,v 1.1 2014/01/10 07:21:16 pho Exp $ | |Add atomic operations for PowerPC platforms without GCC >= 4.1. This |should probably be sent to the upstream. | |--- src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_atomic.h.orig 2014-01-10 06:56:00.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_atomic.h -------------------------- Patching file src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_atomic.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 31. Hunk #2 succeeded at 133. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_gallium_include_pipe_p__config.h => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_gallium_include_pipe_p__config.h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_gallium_include_pipe_p__config.h,v 1.3 2014/02/04 10:51:30 obache Exp $ | |Adjust Endianness for PowerPC, NetBSD, OpenBSD or SunOS. | |--- src/gallium/include/pipe/p_config.h.orig 2011-10-15 00:43:58.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/gallium/include/pipe/p_config.h -------------------------- Patching file src/gallium/include/pipe/p_config.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 99. Hunk #2 succeeded at 129. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_glsl_ir__constant__expression.cpp => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_glsl_ir__constant__expression.cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_glsl_ir__constant__expression.cpp,v 1.1 2013/05/19 02:03:57 obache Exp $ | |* band-aid patch for missing fxp2f(3) on NetBSD<6 | |--- src/glsl/ir_constant_expression.cpp.orig 2011-10-15 00:43:58.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/glsl/ir_constant_expression.cpp -------------------------- Patching file src/glsl/ir_constant_expression.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 39. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_glsl_ralloc.c => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_glsl_ralloc.c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_glsl_ralloc.c,v 1.1 2014/01/24 23:00:15 ryoon Exp $ | |* Fix exit time segfault of qt5 application with modular xorg | |--- src/glsl/ralloc.c.orig 2011-10-15 00:43:58.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/glsl/ralloc.c -------------------------- Patching file src/glsl/ralloc.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 283. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_glu_sgi_glu.exports => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_glu_sgi_glu.exports Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_glu_sgi_glu.exports,v 1.1 2013/05/16 05:22:02 richard Exp $ | |--- src/glu/sgi/glu.exports.orig 2010-02-05 00:10:40.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/glu/sgi/glu.exports -------------------------- Patching file src/glu/sgi/glu.exports using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 57. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_glx_XF86dri.c => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_glx_XF86dri.c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_glx_XF86dri.c,v 1.1 2013/12/12 14:44:10 is Exp $ | |--- src/glx/XF86dri.c.orig 2010-10-19 17:58:29.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/glx/XF86dri.c -------------------------- Patching file src/glx/XF86dri.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 43. Hunk #2 succeeded at 202. Hunk #3 succeeded at 301. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_common_dri__util.h => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_common_dri__util.h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_common_dri__util.h,v 1.1 2013/05/16 05:22:02 richard Exp $ | |--- src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/dri_util.h.orig 2011-07-09 01:31:41.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/dri_util.h -------------------------- Patching file src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/dri_util.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 58. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_common_mmio.h => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_common_mmio.h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_common_mmio.h,v 1.1 2013/05/16 05:22:02 richard Exp $ | |--- src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/mmio.h.orig 2010-02-05 00:10:40.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/mmio.h -------------------------- Patching file src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/mmio.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 34. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i915_intel__batchbuffer.c => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i915_intel__batchbuffer.c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i915_intel__batchbuffer.c,v 1.1 2013/05/16 05:22:02 richard Exp $ | |--- src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_batchbuffer.c.orig 2011-10-15 04:29:59.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_batchbuffer.c -------------------------- Patching file src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_batchbuffer.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 427. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i915_intel__tris.c => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i915_intel__tris.c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i915_intel__tris.c,v 1.1 2013/05/16 05:22:02 richard Exp $ | |--- src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_tris.c.orig 2011-10-15 00:43:58.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_tris.c -------------------------- Patching file src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_tris.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 337. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i965_brw__draw.c => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i965_brw__draw.c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i965_brw__draw.c,v 1.1 2013/05/16 05:22:02 richard Exp $ | |--- src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c.orig 2013-04-23 05:46:06.246377394 +0000 |+++ src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c -------------------------- Patching file src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 162 (offset -6 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 179 (offset -6 lines). done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i965_brw__draw__upload.c => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i965_brw__draw__upload.c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i965_brw__draw__upload.c,v 1.1 2013/05/16 05:22:02 richard Exp $ | |--- src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw_upload.c.orig 2011-10-15 00:43:58.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw_upload.c -------------------------- Patching file src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw_upload.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 531. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i965_brw__misc__state.c => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i965_brw__misc__state.c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i965_brw__misc__state.c,v 1.1 2013/05/16 05:22:02 richard Exp $ | |--- src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_misc_state.c.orig 2013-04-23 05:46:06.246006959 +0000 |+++ src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_misc_state.c -------------------------- Patching file src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_misc_state.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 223. Hunk #2 succeeded at 462. Hunk #3 succeeded at 516. Hunk #4 succeeded at 566. Hunk #5 succeeded at 605. Hunk #6 succeeded at 642. Hunk #7 succeeded at 777. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i965_gen6__vs__state.c => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i965_gen6__vs__state.c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i965_gen6__vs__state.c,v 1.1 2013/05/16 05:22:02 richard Exp $ | |--- src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen6_vs_state.c.orig 2011-11-23 01:09:52.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen6_vs_state.c -------------------------- Patching file src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen6_vs_state.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 120. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i965_gen6__wm__state.c => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i965_gen6__wm__state.c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i965_gen6__wm__state.c,v 1.1 2013/05/16 05:22:02 richard Exp $ | |--- src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen6_wm_state.c.orig 2011-10-15 00:43:58.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen6_wm_state.c -------------------------- Patching file src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen6_wm_state.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 102. Hunk #2 succeeded at 122. Hunk #3 succeeded at 181. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i965_intel__batchbuffer.c => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i965_intel__batchbuffer.c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_i965_intel__batchbuffer.c,v 1.1 2013/05/16 05:22:02 richard Exp $ | |--- src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c.orig 2011-10-15 04:29:59.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c -------------------------- Patching file src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 427. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_intel_intel__context.c => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_intel_intel__context.c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_intel_intel__context.c,v 1.1 2013/05/16 05:22:02 richard Exp $ | |--- src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_context.c.orig 2011-11-23 01:10:52.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_context.c -------------------------- Patching file src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_context.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 737. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_intel_intel__context.h => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_intel_intel__context.h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_intel_intel__context.h,v 1.1 2013/05/16 05:22:02 richard Exp $ | |--- src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_context.h.orig 2011-10-15 00:43:58.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_context.h -------------------------- Patching file src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_context.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 304. Hunk #2 succeeded at 368. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_mach64_mach64__context.h => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_mach64_mach64__context.h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_mesa_drivers_dri_mach64_mach64__context.h,v 1.2 2013/05/18 05:57:10 obache Exp $ | |--- src/mesa/drivers/dri/mach64/mach64_context.h.orig 2011-10-15 00:43:58.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/mesa/drivers/dri/mach64/mach64_context.h -------------------------- Patching file src/mesa/drivers/dri/mach64/mach64_context.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 37. Hunk #2 succeeded at 298. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_x11_Makefile => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_drivers_x11_Makefile Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_mesa_drivers_x11_Makefile,v 1.1 2013/05/20 06:59:18 sbd Exp $ | |Build the x11 version libGL.so with version numbering major 1 and minor 2, |the same a the glx version of libGL (simplifies PLIST handling). | |--- src/mesa/drivers/x11/Makefile.orig 2011-10-15 00:43:58.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/mesa/drivers/x11/Makefile -------------------------- Patching file src/mesa/drivers/x11/Makefile using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 61. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_main_compiler.h => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_main_compiler.h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_mesa_main_compiler.h,v 1.3 2013/06/16 04:16:59 obache Exp $ | |--- src/mesa/main/compiler.h.orig 2011-11-23 01:09:52.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/mesa/main/compiler.h -------------------------- Patching file src/mesa/main/compiler.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 248. Hunk #2 succeeded at 282. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_main_imports.c => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_main_imports.c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_mesa_main_imports.c,v 1.1 2013/05/16 05:22:02 richard Exp $ | |--- src/mesa/main/imports.c.orig 2011-10-15 00:43:58.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/mesa/main/imports.c -------------------------- Patching file src/mesa/main/imports.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 514. done => Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_main_imports.h => Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos/../MesaLib/patches/patch-src_mesa_main_imports.h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-src_mesa_main_imports.h,v 1.1 2013/05/16 05:22:02 richard Exp $ | |--- src/mesa/main/imports.h.orig 2011-10-15 00:43:58.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/mesa/main/imports.h -------------------------- Patching file src/mesa/main/imports.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 570. done ===> Creating toolchain wrappers for MesaDemos-7.11.2 src=/usr/X11R7/lib/pkgconfig/fixesproto.pc dst=/scratch/graphics/MesaDemos/work/.buildlink/lib/pkgconfig/fixesext.pc; /bin/mkdir -p /scratch/graphics/MesaDemos/work/.buildlink/lib/pkgconfig; if test -f ${src}; then /bin/ln -sf ${src} ${dst}; fi ===> Configuring for MesaDemos-7.11.2 cd /scratch/graphics/MesaDemos/work/Mesa-7.11.2 && /usr/bin/make configure aclocal autoconf => Modifying GNU configure scripts to avoid --recheck => Replacing config-guess with pkgsrc versions => Replacing config-sub with pkgsrc versions => Replacing install-sh with pkgsrc version => Checking for portability problems in extracted files checking build system type... x86_64--netbsd checking host system type... x86_64--netbsd checking for x86_64--netbsd-gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking for suffix of executables... checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E checking for x86_64--netbsd-gcc... (cached) gcc checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... (cached) yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... (cached) none needed checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether c++ accepts -g... yes checking for gmake... make checking for python2... no checking for python... python checking for makedepend... /scratch/graphics/MesaDemos/work/.tools/bin/makedepend checking for sed... /usr/bin/sed checking for flex... /scratch/graphics/MesaDemos/work/.tools/bin/flex checking for bison... /scratch/graphics/MesaDemos/work/.tools/bin/bison checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o pbulkXXX -g users checking if compiling with clang... no checking whether gcc version is sufficient... yes checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking whether gcc supports -fvisibility=hidden... yes checking whether c++ supports -fvisibility=hidden... yes checking whether to enable assembly... yes, x86_64 checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fPIC checking for dlopen... yes checking for posix_memalign... yes checking pkg-config files for X11 are available... yes checking for X11... yes checking for GLPROTO... yes checking for LIBDRM... no configure: error: Package requirements (libdrm >= 2.4.24) were not met: Requested 'libdrm >= 2.4.24' but version of libdrm is 2.4.23 Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables LIBDRM_CFLAGS and LIBDRM_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /bulk-data/pkgsrc/graphics/MesaDemos