=> Bootstrap dependency digest>=20010302: found digest-20121220 ===> Skipping vulnerability checks. WARNING: No /var/db/pkg/pkg-vulnerabilities file found. WARNING: To fix run: `/usr/sbin/pkg_admin -K /var/db/pkg fetch-pkg-vulnerabilities'. => Checksum SHA1 OK for binutils-2.24-mint-20131217.patch.bz2 => Checksum RMD160 OK for binutils-2.24-mint-20131217.patch.bz2 => Checksum SHA1 OK for binutils-2.24.tar.bz2 => Checksum RMD160 OK for binutils-2.24.tar.bz2 ===> Installing dependencies for cross-freemint-binutils-2.24 => Tool dependency gmake>=3.81: found gmake-4.0 => Tool dependency checkperms>=1.1: found checkperms-1.11 ===> Overriding tools for cross-freemint-binutils-2.24 ===> Extracting for cross-freemint-binutils-2.24 ===> Patching for cross-freemint-binutils-2.24 => Applying distribution patches for cross-freemint-binutils-2.24 => Applying distribution patch binutils-2.24-mint-20131217.patch.bz2 Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/bfd/Makefile.am binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/Makefile.am |--- binutils-2.24/bfd/Makefile.am 2013-12-02 10:30:28.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/Makefile.am 2013-12-17 23:49:32.515625000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file bfd/Makefile.am using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 427. Hunk #2 succeeded at 615. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/bfd/Makefile.in binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/Makefile.in |--- binutils-2.24/bfd/Makefile.in 2013-12-02 10:30:30.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/Makefile.in 2013-12-17 23:49:32.562500000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file bfd/Makefile.in using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 729. Hunk #2 succeeded at 917. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/bfd/acinclude.m4 binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/acinclude.m4 |--- binutils-2.24/bfd/acinclude.m4 2013-11-04 16:33:37.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/acinclude.m4 2013-12-17 23:49:32.562500000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file bfd/acinclude.m4 using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 23. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/bfd/aoutx.h binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/aoutx.h |--- binutils-2.24/bfd/aoutx.h 2013-11-04 16:33:37.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/aoutx.h 2013-12-17 23:49:32.578125000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file bfd/aoutx.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1841. Hunk #2 succeeded at 4226. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/bfd/bfd-in.h binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/bfd-in.h |--- binutils-2.24/bfd/bfd-in.h 2013-11-04 16:33:37.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/bfd-in.h 2013-12-17 23:49:32.578125000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file bfd/bfd-in.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 747. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/bfd/bfd-in2.h binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/bfd-in2.h |--- binutils-2.24/bfd/bfd-in2.h 2013-11-18 09:40:15.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/bfd-in2.h 2013-12-17 23:49:32.593750000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file bfd/bfd-in2.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 754. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/bfd/config.bfd binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/config.bfd |--- binutils-2.24/bfd/config.bfd 2013-11-04 16:33:37.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/config.bfd 2013-12-17 23:49:32.593750000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file bfd/config.bfd using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 868. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/bfd/configure binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/configure |--- binutils-2.24/bfd/configure 2013-12-02 10:30:30.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/configure 2013-12-17 23:54:06.921875000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file bfd/configure using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 12121. Hunk #2 succeeded at 13661. Hunk #3 succeeded at 15458. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/bfd/configure.in binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/configure.in |--- binutils-2.24/bfd/configure.in 2013-12-02 10:30:28.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/configure.in 2013-12-17 23:54:26.593750000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file bfd/configure.in using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 126. Hunk #2 succeeded at 947. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/bfd/libaout.h binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/libaout.h |--- binutils-2.24/bfd/libaout.h 2013-11-04 16:33:37.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/libaout.h 2013-12-17 23:49:34.343750000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file bfd/libaout.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 422. Hunk #2 succeeded at 453. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/bfd/prg-mint.c binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/prg-mint.c |--- binutils-2.24/bfd/prg-mint.c 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/prg-mint.c 2013-12-17 23:49:34.359375000 +0100 -------------------------- (Creating file bfd/prg-mint.c...) Patching file bfd/prg-mint.c using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/bfd/targets.c binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/targets.c |--- binutils-2.24/bfd/targets.c 2013-11-04 16:33:37.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/bfd/targets.c 2013-12-17 23:49:34.359375000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file bfd/targets.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 818. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/binutils/configure binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/binutils/configure |--- binutils-2.24/binutils/configure 2013-11-04 16:33:37.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/binutils/configure 2013-12-17 23:49:34.406250000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file binutils/configure using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 13201. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/binutils/dlltool.c binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/binutils/dlltool.c |--- binutils-2.24/binutils/dlltool.c 2013-11-04 16:33:37.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/binutils/dlltool.c 2013-12-17 23:49:35.656250000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file binutils/dlltool.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 4390. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/binutils/dllwrap.c binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/binutils/dllwrap.c |--- binutils-2.24/binutils/dllwrap.c 2013-11-04 16:33:37.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/binutils/dllwrap.c 2013-12-17 23:49:35.671875000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file binutils/dllwrap.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 255. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/binutils/readelf.c binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/binutils/readelf.c |--- binutils-2.24/binutils/readelf.c 2013-11-18 09:40:15.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/binutils/readelf.c 2013-12-17 23:49:35.671875000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file binutils/readelf.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10839. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/binutils/resrc.c binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/binutils/resrc.c |--- binutils-2.24/binutils/resrc.c 2013-11-04 16:33:37.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/binutils/resrc.c 2013-12-17 23:49:35.703125000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file binutils/resrc.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 391. Hunk #2 succeeded at 509. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-2.d binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-2.d |--- binutils-2.24/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-2.d 2013-11-04 16:33:37.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-2.d 2013-12-17 23:49:35.703125000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-2.d using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 3. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-3.d binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-3.d |--- binutils-2.24/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-3.d 2013-11-04 16:33:37.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-3.d 2013-12-17 23:52:24.437500000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-3.d using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 3. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/gas/config/te-mint.h binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/gas/config/te-mint.h |--- binutils-2.24/gas/config/te-mint.h 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/gas/config/te-mint.h 2013-12-17 23:49:35.718750000 +0100 -------------------------- (Creating file gas/config/te-mint.h...) Patching file gas/config/te-mint.h using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/gas/configure.tgt binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/gas/configure.tgt |--- binutils-2.24/gas/configure.tgt 2013-11-04 16:33:37.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/gas/configure.tgt 2013-12-17 23:49:35.718750000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file gas/configure.tgt using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 303. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1u.d binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1u.d |--- binutils-2.24/gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1u.d 2013-11-04 16:33:38.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1u.d 2013-12-17 23:49:35.734375000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file gas/testsuite/gas/all/weakref1u.d using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 3. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/all.exp binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/all.exp |--- binutils-2.24/gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/all.exp 2013-11-04 16:33:38.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/all.exp 2013-12-17 23:49:35.734375000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/all.exp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 91. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/br-isaa.d binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/br-isaa.d |--- binutils-2.24/gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/br-isaa.d 2013-11-04 16:33:38.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/br-isaa.d 2013-12-17 23:49:35.781250000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/br-isaa.d using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/br-isab.d binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/br-isab.d |--- binutils-2.24/gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/br-isab.d 2013-11-04 16:33:38.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/br-isab.d 2013-12-17 23:49:35.781250000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/br-isab.d using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/br-isac.d binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/br-isac.d |--- binutils-2.24/gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/br-isac.d 2013-11-04 16:33:38.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/br-isac.d 2013-12-17 23:49:35.781250000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/br-isac.d using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/include/filenames.h binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/include/filenames.h |--- binutils-2.24/include/filenames.h 2013-11-04 16:33:39.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/include/filenames.h 2013-12-17 23:49:35.796875000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file include/filenames.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 32. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/include/getopt.h binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/include/getopt.h |--- binutils-2.24/include/getopt.h 2013-11-04 16:33:39.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/include/getopt.h 2013-12-17 23:49:35.796875000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file include/getopt.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 106. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/ld/Makefile.am binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/ld/Makefile.am |--- binutils-2.24/ld/Makefile.am 2013-11-26 12:37:33.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/ld/Makefile.am 2013-12-17 23:49:35.812500000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file ld/Makefile.am using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 330. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1494. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/ld/Makefile.in binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/ld/Makefile.in |--- binutils-2.24/ld/Makefile.in 2013-11-26 12:37:33.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/ld/Makefile.in 2013-12-17 23:49:35.843750000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file ld/Makefile.in using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 638. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1332. Hunk #3 succeeded at 2979. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/ld/configure binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/ld/configure |--- binutils-2.24/ld/configure 2013-11-04 16:33:39.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/ld/configure 2013-12-17 23:49:35.890625000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file ld/configure using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 16645. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/ld/configure.tgt binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/ld/configure.tgt |--- binutils-2.24/ld/configure.tgt 2013-11-26 12:37:33.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/ld/configure.tgt 2013-12-17 23:49:35.953125000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file ld/configure.tgt using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 405. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/ld/emulparams/m68kmint.sh binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/ld/emulparams/m68kmint.sh |--- binutils-2.24/ld/emulparams/m68kmint.sh 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/ld/emulparams/m68kmint.sh 2013-12-17 23:49:35.968750000 +0100 -------------------------- (Creating file ld/emulparams/m68kmint.sh...) Patching file ld/emulparams/m68kmint.sh using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/ld/emultempl/mint.em binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/ld/emultempl/mint.em |--- binutils-2.24/ld/emultempl/mint.em 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/ld/emultempl/mint.em 2013-12-17 23:49:35.968750000 +0100 -------------------------- (Creating file ld/emultempl/mint.em...) Patching file ld/emultempl/mint.em using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/ld/scripttempl/m68kmint.sc binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/ld/scripttempl/m68kmint.sc |--- binutils-2.24/ld/scripttempl/m68kmint.sc 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/ld/scripttempl/m68kmint.sc 2013-12-17 23:49:35.968750000 +0100 -------------------------- (Creating file ld/scripttempl/m68kmint.sc...) Patching file ld/scripttempl/m68kmint.sc using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/libiberty/hex.c binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/libiberty/hex.c |--- binutils-2.24/libiberty/hex.c 2013-11-04 16:33:40.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/libiberty/hex.c 2013-12-17 23:49:35.984375000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file libiberty/hex.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 24. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -aurN binutils-2.24/libiberty/safe-ctype.c binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/libiberty/safe-ctype.c |--- binutils-2.24/libiberty/safe-ctype.c 2013-11-04 16:33:40.000000000 +0100 |+++ binutils-2.24-mint-20131217/libiberty/safe-ctype.c 2013-12-17 23:49:35.984375000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file libiberty/safe-ctype.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 119. done ===> Creating toolchain wrappers for cross-freemint-binutils-2.24 ===> Configuring for cross-freemint-binutils-2.24 /bin/cp /bulk-data/pkgsrc/mk/gnu-config/config.guess /scratch/cross/freemint-binutils/work/binutils-2.24 /bin/cp /bulk-data/pkgsrc/mk/gnu-config/config.sub /scratch/cross/freemint-binutils/work/binutils-2.24 => Modifying GNU configure scripts to avoid --recheck => Replacing config-guess with pkgsrc versions => Replacing config-sub with pkgsrc versions => Replacing install-sh with pkgsrc version => Checking for portability problems in extracted files checking build system type... x86_64--netbsd checking host system type... x86_64--netbsd checking target system type... m68k-atari-mint checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o pbulkXXX -g users checking whether ln works... yes checking whether ln -s works... yes checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /usr/bin/sed checking for gawk... /usr/bin/awk checking for x86_64--netbsd-gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... no checking whether c++ accepts -g... no checking whether g++ accepts -static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc... no checking for x86_64--netbsd-gnatbind... no checking for gnatbind... no checking for x86_64--netbsd-gnatmake... no checking for gnatmake... no checking whether compiler driver understands Ada... no checking how to compare bootstrapped objects... cmp $$f1 $$f2 16 16 checking for objdir... .libs checking for version 0.10 of ISL... no checking for version 0.11 of ISL... no checking for default BUILD_CONFIG... checking for bison... no checking for byacc... no checking for yacc... yacc checking for bison... no checking for gm4... no checking for gnum4... no checking for m4... m4 checking for flex... flex checking for flex... flex checking for makeinfo... /scratch/cross/freemint-binutils/work/.tools/bin/makeinfo checking for expect... no checking for runtest... no checking for x86_64--netbsd-ar... no checking for ar... ar checking for x86_64--netbsd-as... no checking for as... as checking for x86_64--netbsd-dlltool... no checking for dlltool... no checking for x86_64--netbsd-ld... no checking for ld... ld checking for x86_64--netbsd-lipo... no checking for lipo... no checking for x86_64--netbsd-nm... no checking for nm... nm checking for x86_64--netbsd-ranlib... no checking for ranlib... ranlib checking for x86_64--netbsd-strip... no checking for strip... strip checking for x86_64--netbsd-windres... no checking for windres... no checking for x86_64--netbsd-windmc... no checking for windmc... no checking for x86_64--netbsd-objcopy... no checking for objcopy... objcopy checking for x86_64--netbsd-objdump... no checking for objdump... objdump checking for x86_64--netbsd-readelf... no checking for readelf... readelf checking for m68k-atari-mint-cc... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-gcc... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-c++... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-g++... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-cxx... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-gxx... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-gcc... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-gcj... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-gfortran... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-gccgo... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-ar... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-as... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-dlltool... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-ld... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-lipo... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-nm... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-objdump... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-ranlib... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-readelf... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-strip... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-windres... no checking for m68k-atari-mint-windmc... no checking where to find the target ar... just compiled checking where to find the target as... just compiled checking where to find the target cc... pre-installed checking where to find the target c++... pre-installed checking where to find the target c++ for libstdc++... pre-installed checking where to find the target dlltool... just compiled checking where to find the target gcc... pre-installed checking where to find the target gcj... pre-installed checking where to find the target gfortran... pre-installed checking where to find the target gccgo... pre-installed checking where to find the target ld... just compiled checking where to find the target lipo... pre-installed checking where to find the target nm... just compiled checking where to find the target objdump... just compiled checking where to find the target ranlib... just compiled checking where to find the target readelf... just compiled checking where to find the target strip... just compiled checking where to find the target windres... just compiled checking where to find the target windmc... just compiled checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile WARNING: *** Please consider adding c++ to USE_LANGUAGES in the package Makefile.