=> Bootstrap dependency digest>=20010302: found digest-20121220
WARNING: [license.mk] Every package should define a LICENSE.
===> Skipping vulnerability checks.
WARNING: No /var/db/pkg/pkg-vulnerabilities file found.
WARNING: To fix run: `/usr/sbin/pkg_admin -K /var/db/pkg fetch-pkg-vulnerabilities'.
=> Checksum SHA1 OK for fMSX351.zip
=> Checksum RMD160 OK for fMSX351.zip
===> Installing dependencies for fmsx-3.5.1nb1
=> Tool dependency checkperms>=1.1: found checkperms-1.11
=> Build dependency x11-links>=0.91: found x11-links-0.91
=> Build dependency cwrappers>=20141129: found cwrappers-20141129
===> Overriding tools for fmsx-3.5.1nb1
===> Extracting for fmsx-3.5.1nb1
===> Patching for fmsx-3.5.1nb1
=> Applying pkgsrc patches for fmsx-3.5.1nb1
=> Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-EMULIB_FDIDisk.c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-EMULIB_FDIDisk.c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-EMULIB_FDIDisk.c,v 1.1 2012/07/18 23:23:21 marino Exp $
|
|Make compatible with libz >= 1.2.6
|
|--- EMULib/FDIDisk.c.orig	2007-12-30 15:59:36.000000000 +0000
|+++ EMULib/FDIDisk.c
--------------------------
Patching file EMULib/FDIDisk.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 178.
done
=> Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-EMULIB_Floppy.c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-EMULIB_Floppy.c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-EMULIB_Floppy.c,v 1.1 2012/07/18 23:23:21 marino Exp $
|
|Make compatible with libz >= 1.2.6
|
|--- EMULib/Floppy.c.orig	2007-12-30 15:59:58.000000000 +0000
|+++ EMULib/Floppy.c
--------------------------
Patching file EMULib/Floppy.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 436.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 504.
done
=> Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-EMULib_LibUnix.c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-EMULib_LibUnix.c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-EMULib_LibUnix.c,v 1.1 2012/12/20 21:57:52 joerg Exp $
|
|--- EMULib/LibUnix.c.orig	2012-12-20 12:25:35.000000000 +0000
|+++ EMULib/LibUnix.c
--------------------------
Patching file EMULib/LibUnix.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 12.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 144.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 161.
done
=> Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-aa
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-aa
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-aa,v 1.5 2010/01/07 08:38:43 obache Exp $
|
|--- fMSX/Unix/Makefile.orig	2008-01-28 19:29:59.000000000 +0000
|+++ fMSX/Unix/Makefile
--------------------------
Patching file fMSX/Unix/Makefile using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 10.
done
=> Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-ab
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-ab
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ab,v 1.5 2010/01/07 08:38:43 obache Exp $
|
|--- EMULib/SndUnix.c.orig	2007-12-30 16:01:34.000000000 +0000
|+++ EMULib/SndUnix.c
--------------------------
Patching file EMULib/SndUnix.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 30.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 86.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 230.
done
=> Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-ae
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-ae
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ae,v 1.1 2010/01/07 08:38:44 obache Exp $
|
|--- EMULib/NetUnix.c.orig	2007-12-30 16:01:15.000000000 +0000
|+++ EMULib/NetUnix.c
--------------------------
Patching file EMULib/NetUnix.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 17.
done
=> Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-af
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-af
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-af,v 1.1 2010/01/07 08:38:44 obache Exp $
|
|--- EMULib/Rules.Unix.orig	2008-01-28 19:48:23.000000000 +0000
|+++ EMULib/Rules.Unix
--------------------------
Patching file EMULib/Rules.Unix using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
done
=> Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-ag
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-ag
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ag,v 1.1 2010/01/07 08:38:44 obache Exp $
|
|--- EMULib/Rules.gcc.orig	2008-01-28 19:17:27.000000000 +0000
|+++ EMULib/Rules.gcc
--------------------------
Patching file EMULib/Rules.gcc using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 8.
done
=> Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-ah
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-ah
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ah,v 1.1 2010/01/07 08:38:44 obache Exp $
|
|--- fMSX/fMSX.c.orig	2007-12-30 16:03:22.000000000 +0000
|+++ fMSX/fMSX.c
--------------------------
Patching file fMSX/fMSX.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 72.
done
=> Verifying /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-fMSX_MSX.c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /bulk-data/pkgsrc/emulators/fmsx/patches/patch-fMSX_MSX.c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-fMSX_MSX.c,v 1.1 2012/07/18 23:23:21 marino Exp $
|
|Make compatible with libz >= 1.2.6
|
|--- fMSX/MSX.c.orig	2008-01-29 22:32:53.000000000 +0000
|+++ fMSX/MSX.c
--------------------------
Patching file fMSX/MSX.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 2440.
done
===> Creating toolchain wrappers for fmsx-3.5.1nb1
===> Configuring for fmsx-3.5.1nb1
=> Checking for portability problems in extracted files